USPTO serial 75694614
SUPRADERM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPRADERM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter D. Murray
PETER D MURRAY COOPER & DUNHAM LLP1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS APPLIED TOPICALLY AND/OR THROUGH TRANSDERMAL PATCHES IN THE TREATMENT OF MUSCLE, SKELTAL AND ARTHRITIS PAIN, SKIN RASHES, ITCHING, IRRITATING, INFLAMMATION, SKIN INFECTIONS, ACNE, DRY SKIN, ECZEMA, PSORIASIS AND SEBORRHEA, INSECT BITS,AND WOUNDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |