USPTO serial 75694628
FILIBUSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2877762Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 24, 2004
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FILIBUSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
9940 EVERGEM, BE
9940 EVERGEM, BE
9940 EVERGEM, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN C. HOLMAN
JOHN C. HOLMAN JACOBSON HOLMAN, PLLC400 SSEVENTH STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 18, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |