USPTO serial 75694861
MAPLE CREEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2622653Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 2002
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAPLE CREEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Peterborough, Ontario K9J 3X2, CA
Peterborough, Ontario K9J 3X2, CA
Peterborough, Ontario K9J 3X2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan W. Falk
Ryan W. Falk CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP1405 East Sixth StreetThe Calfee BuildingCLEVELAND, OH 44114-1607Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | CABINETS, NAMELY KITCHEN CABINETS, VANITIES, MEDICINE CABINETS, SHELVING, STORAGE CABINETS, OFFICE FURNITURE AND HOME FURNITURE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 4, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 4, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |