Drawing for AT TV

USPTO serial 75694870

AT TV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AT TV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. Plumley

DAVID A PLUMLEY CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038BROADCASTING TELEVISION PROGRAMMING INFORMATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 23, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 23, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 23, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 26, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 11, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 6, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 1, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance