USPTO serial 75695638
LPSTENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 28, 2003
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LPSTENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Klicpera
MICHAEL E KLICPERA C/O INTERVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES INC3574 RUFFIN RDSAN DIEGO, CA 92123UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | interventional apparatus, namely a stent for treatment of cardiovascular disease | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 18, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |