USPTO serial 75695827
EMERGENCY 9 GOLF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 2, 2006
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMERGENCY 9 GOLF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Woodbridge, IL
Glen Ellyn, IL
Glen Ellyn, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas G. de la Torre
Nicholas G. de la Torre BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP.O. BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Tops, shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, bottoms, shorts, pants, sweatpants, socks, belts, gloves, ties, sleepwear, boxer shorts and underwear, jackets and foul weather gear, sweat suits, golf shoes, visors, hats, caps, and sweatbands | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |