Drawing for DAEMO ENGINEERING CO., LTD.

USPTO serial 75696998

DAEMO ENGINEERING CO., LTD.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2484287Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 4, 2001
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with DAEMO ENGINEERING CO., LTD.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert E. Bushnell

Robert E. Bushnell Robert E Bushnell & Law Firm2029 K Street N.W.Suite 600Washington, DC 20006-1004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MACHINE TOOLS, NAMELY AUGERS, BREAKERS, CHISELS, CRUSHERS, HAMMERS, PECKERS, PULVERIZERS AND SHEARS, HYDRAULIC AUGERS, HYDRAULIC BREAKERS, HYDRAULIC CHISELS, HYDRAULIC CRUSHERS, HYDRAULIC HAMMERS, HYDRAULIC PECKERS, HYDRAULIC PULVERIZERS AND HYDRAULIC SHEARS, AUGERS, BREAKERS, CHISELS, CRUSHERS, HAMMERS, PECKERS, PULVERIZERS AND SHEARS, HYDRAULIC AUGERS, HYDRAULIC BREAKERS, HYDRAULIC CHISELS, HYDRAULIC CRUSHERS, HYDRAULIC HAMMERS, HYDRAULIC PECKERS, HYDRAULIC PULVERIZERS AND HYDRAULIC SHEARS FOR CONSTRUCTION, CUTTING, DEMOLITION, DRILLING, EXCAVATION, QUARRYING, SCRAPPING AND TRENCHINGSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2012CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 12, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 30, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 10, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Mar 4, 2008815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 4, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 4, 2001R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 12, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 26, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2000ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance