USPTO serial 75697097
SOLVE:CPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOLVE:CPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerry W. Mills
JERRY W MILLS BAKER & BOTTS LLP2001 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201-2980UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for a complex instruction set having a high-level application program interface optimized for a complex instruction set computing environment and used for programmatic connections between legacy complex instruction set computing and distributed transmission control protocol/global computer network protocol applications, and a management tool that can monitor and manage connections and provide complex instruction set computing with file transfer capability for bulk data transfer and printed instructional manuals, therefor, sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |