Drawing for BEER.COM

USPTO serial 75697354

BEER.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEER.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Holly M Ford

HOLLY M FORD BANNER & WITCOFF1001 G ST NW 11TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Dissemination of advertising for others via a global computer networkACTIVEDec 23, 1993
038Providing on-line chat rooms for the transmission of messages among computer users concerning food, beverages and entertainmentACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, providing on-line magazines, articles, and information in the fields of movies, television, music, books, sports and current eventsACTIVEDec 23, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 11, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 8, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 8, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 12, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 19, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 18, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 29, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance