USPTO serial 75697363
ASTROLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASTROLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bethesda, MD
Bethesda, MD
Lockheed Martin Global Telecommunications, Inc.
Bethesda, MD
Other trademarks owned by Lockheed Martin Global Telecommunications, Inc.
Bethesda, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Lyden
TIMOTHY J LYDEN HOGAN & HARTSONATTN BOX INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY8300 GREENSBORO DR STE 1100MCLEAN, VA 22102-3609Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Ground terminal equipment for satellite communications systems; namely, satellite network processors and satellite dishes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Lockheed Martin Global Telecommunications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Astrolink International LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ASTROLINK
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |