USPTO serial 75697466
ALL-CON WORLD SYSTEMS INC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALL-CON WORLD SYSTEMS INC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD M MCMAHON SR
RICHARD M MCMAHON SR SCALLY SCALLY & MCMAHON PA3 HUNTER LAKE CTUPPERCO, MD 21155UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | mixing, blending, and pneumatic conveying systems for use in agriculture, beverage, chemical, food, plastics and packaging industries comprised of mechanical and pneumatic conveyors, vacuum pumps and associated vacuum lines, air compressors, mechanical mixing machines, and hot melt glue machines, all sold as a unit | ACTIVE | May 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |