Drawing for EB KIDS

USPTO serial 75697574

EB KIDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EB KIDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John F. A. Earley III

JOHN F A EARLEY III HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEYTHE COMMONS AT VALLEY FORGE E1288 VALLEY FORGE RD P O BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Mail order, online and retail store services featuring children's toys and books, children's video tapes, CD's and audio tapes, interactive toys, puzzles and board games, plush toys, children's arts and crafts, science and nature items, computer hardware, software and peripherals, computer-related furniture, video game hardware, software and accessories, electronic board games, hand-held entertainment hardware and software, video and PC games, trading cards, game cards, books, magazines, and accessories related to all of the foregoing, and the foregoing featuring acceptance of trade-ins of trading cards, game cards, video games and PC games and also featuring used trading cards, game cards, video games and PC gamesACTIVE—
041Rental of video games and PC gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 3, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 3, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 22, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance