USPTO serial 75697874
THE NATIONAL MATERNITY LEAGUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE NATIONAL MATERNITY LEAGUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
REBECCA CITRON NUNBERG
REBECCA CITRON NUNBERG REBECCA CITRON NUNBERG JD PC535 E 86TH STNEW YORK, NY 10028UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | women's apparel, namely regular and maternity apparel, namely, shirts, sweaters, blouses, tops, dresses, skirts, jumpers, jumpsuits, pants, shorts, rompers, swimsuits, jogging suits, sweat shirts, sweatpants, leotards, unitards, jackets, slickers, hats, socks, pajamas, nightgowns, shoes, boots, slippers, sneakers, coats and capes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |