USPTO serial 75697882
TIN MAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIN MAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elise A. Tenen-Aoki
ELISE A TENEN-AOKI WARNER BROS4000 WARNER BLVDBRIDGE BLDG 5TH FLBURBANK, CA 91522Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PROCESSED AND DRIED VEGETABLES; PROCESSED AND DRIED FRUITS; PROCESSED GINSENG; RAISINS, FRUIT SALADS, FRUIT JELLIES AND MARMALADE; PRESERVED ONIONS; PRESERVED OLIVES; CRYSTALLIZED FRUITS; JAMS, CHOCOLATE NUT BUTTER, COCOA BUTTER AND PEANUT BUTTER; CANNED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; PICKLES; SOYBEAN-BASED FOOD BEVERAGE USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE; FROZEN FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; POTATO CHIPS; PROCESSED AND DRIED MEAT; MEAT; MILK; SEAFOOD; AND MARGARINE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |