USPTO serial 75697919
WALLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WALLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear
JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Attache cases, backpacks, all purpose sport bags, all-purpose athletic bags, animal game bags, athletic bags, barrel bags, beach bags, book bags, Boston bags, carry-on bags, cosmetic bags sold empty, duffel bags, garment bags for travel, gym bags, hunters' game bags, school bags, school book bags, shaving bags sold empty, shoe bags for travel, shoulder bags, sportsman's hunting bags, suit bags, tote bags, travel bags, travelling bags, wrist-mounted carryall bags, bags for campers, briefcases, handbags, key cases, pocket wallets, purses, rucksacks, suitcases, valises, vanity cases sold empty, walking sticks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 20, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |