USPTO serial 75698095
AGATHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AGATHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Farmer's Branch, TX
ORANJESTAD, AW
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, LIPSTICK, BLUSH, FOUNDATION, EYELINER, EYEBROW PENCILS, MASCARA, EYE SHADOW, PRESSED POWDER, LOOSE POWDER, MOISTURIZING HAND, FACE, EYE AND BODY CREAMS, ASTRINGENT FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, FACIAL SCRUB, HERBAL MASK, MUD MASK, SUNTAN LOTION, SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONER, BABY LOTION, BABY OIL AND PERSONAL DEODORANT; FRAGRANCES, NAMELY, PERFUME, COLOGNE, TOILET WATER, PERFUME STICK, BODY POWDER, SOAP | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2019 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 24, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 24, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |