USPTO serial 75698391
0 A.D.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 0 A.D.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Ostfeld
DAVID M OSTFELD CHAMBERLAIN HRDLICKA WHITE ET AL1200 SMITH ST STE 1400HOUSTON, TX 77002-4310UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Bracelets, necklaces, watches, ornamental pins and rings of precious, non-precious metal, plastic and fabric and semi-precious materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Coffee cups and mugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Baseball caps, hats, T-shirts, golf-style collared shirts and sweatshirts of all materials, such as cotton, nylon, polyester and wool blends | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Hair barrettes, hair clips, belt buckles not made of precious metals, ornamental novelty buttons | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Plush toys and accessories therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LeClair, Robert S
- Other trademarks owned by LeClair, Robert S
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named 0 A.D.
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |