USPTO serial 75699233
MICROLIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICROLIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody L. Factor
JODY L FACTOR FACTOR & PARTNERS LLC100 W MONROE ST STE 300CHICAGO, IL 60603-1902UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | household apparatus, namely, fluid delivery device for measuring and delivering fragrant fluids and beneficial agents into the atmosphere and environment; fluid delivery device for measuring and pressurizing fluid within a fluid container; and fluid contaminant absorbing and measuring devices for preserving fluid in a fluid container | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | medical apparatus, namely, fluid delivery device comprised of fluid storage chambers, fluid passage ways, gas generating cells, and emanators for use in the delivery of medicament and drugs to a patient or animal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |