Drawing for ADHESIVE SOFTWARE

USPTO serial 75699428

ADHESIVE SOFTWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADHESIVE SOFTWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHELE P. SCHWARTZ

MICHELE P SCHWARTZ HUGHES & LUCE, LLP1717 MAIN STSTE 2800DALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR MANAGINING AND DISPLAYING CONTENT OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AND SOFTWARE FOR ENABLEMENT OF E-COMMERCE, NAMELY, CATALOGS, SHOPPING CARTS, TRANSACTION ENGINE, ORDER PROCESSING, SALES AND MARKETING, ADMINISTRATION, INVENTORY MANAGEMENT, SHIPPING, CUSTOMER SERVICE AND SUPPORTACTIVE—
035ON-LINE COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, WEB-BASED CONTENT MANAGEMENT, CONTENT DISPLAY AND ENABLEMENT OF E-COMMERCE, NAMELY, CATALOGS, SHOPPING CARTS, TRANSACTION ENGINE, ORDER PROCESSING, SALES AND MARKETING, ADMINISTRATION, INVENTORY MANAGEMENT, SHIPPING, CUSTOMER SERVICE AND SUPPORT VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance