USPTO serial 75700481
LUMANESSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUMANESSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | HANDBAGS; LUGGAGE; BACKPACKS; SPORTS AND DUFFEL BAGS; TOOL, COSMETIC AND TOILETRY BAGS, ALL SOLD EMPTY | ACTIVE | Nov 5, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |