USPTO serial 75700742
BANCOLOMBIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BANCOLOMBIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Gorenstein
CHARLES GORENSTEIN BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management and business administration | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |