USPTO serial 75700849
GLOBUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOBUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph F. Schmidt
JOSEPH F SCHMIDT LAFF, WHITESEL, CONTE & SARET, LTD401 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, namely feeders for chain components, presses for press fitting chain components and dischargers for the assembled chain members and parts therefor sold together as a unit, for the manufacture and assembly of chains and parts of chains; and machine tools, namely machine presses and parts therefor sold together as a unit; driving chains for combustion engines; driving chains, conveyor chains for machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Structural parts of vehicles, namely, driving chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacture of chains, namely driving and conveyor chains, to the order and specification of others; manufacture of machines and machine tools used to create and assemble chains to the order and specification of others; and assembly of chains and machines for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultation services, namely providing technical advice regarding questions of manufacture, assembly and use of chains; providing technical advice regarding questions of manufacture, assembly and use of machines for the manufacture and for the assembly of chains; and product development for others, namely developing machines and machine tools for the manufacture and assembly of chains | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Joh. Winklhofer & Sohne GmbH und Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Joh. Winklhofer & Sohne GmbH und Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GLOBUS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |