USPTO serial 75701051
FIZZIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIZZIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur L. Whinston
ARTHUR L WHINSTON KLARQUIST, SPARKMAN, CAMPBELL, LEIGHONE WORLD TRADE CTR STE 1600121 S W SALMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cleansers, creams and lotions for the body, face and hair; shampoos, conditioners and styling gels for the hair; foaming and fizzing compositions for use in bathtub, said compositions comprising effervescent material; bath gels, after-bath splashes and scents in the form of room fragrances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |