USPTO serial 75701320
HELLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HELLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pasea Estate, Tortola, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith E. Danish
KEITH E DANISH TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORS915 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10010-7108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC CARDS WITH ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS, USED AS DEBIT CARDS, AND ELECTRONIC ADAPTERS WITH CARD READERS FOR THE READING AND UPDATING OF SAID ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC DEBIT CARD TRANSACTIONS RELATED TO THE PAYMENT OF CHARGES INCURRED VIA DEBIT CARDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |