Drawing for EMBEDDED INTELLIGENCE

USPTO serial 75701510

EMBEDDED INTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WILSON, REID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EMBEDDED INTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles E. Baxley

CHARLES E BAXLEY HART, BAXLEY, DANIELS & HOLTON59 JOHN STNEW YORK, NY 10038UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009integrated circuit chips, ASIC, ASSP, and semiconductor chips; integrated circuit chip sets; processor specific integrated circuits; DRAM controllers, high-integration system controllers, PCI bridge controllers, target/slave PCI controllers, burst memory controllers, small system controllers, universal system controllers, reusable IP cores, evaluation boards, reference design boards, and software, namely, semiconductor specific design and integration software, semiconductor and board driver software, and software development kits; and logic analyzer boardsACTIVE
016Application notes, reference designs, documentation, user manuals, data sheets, technical briefs, application notes for the foregoing on CD-ROM and in printed format;ACTIVE
041Educational and training services in technical design, use and programming relating to integrated circuits chips, chip sets controllers, circuit boards and related softwareACTIVE
042Design and manufacture of integrated circuit chips, chip sets, controllers, circuit boards and related software to the specifications of others including preparation of application notes, reference designs, documentation, user manuals, data sheets, technical briefs, application notes for the foregoing on CD-ROM and in printed formatACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance