Drawing for THE FAIRIES

USPTO serial 75701525

THE FAIRIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE FAIRIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH A. SEBOLT

JOSEPH A SEBOLT SAND & SEBOLTAEGIS TWR STE 11004940 MUNSON ST NWCANTON, OH 44718-3615

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPACT DISCS, PRE-RECORDED VIDEO TAPES, AUDIO TAPES, DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS, LASER DISCS AND FILM FEATURING MUSICAL SOUND RECORDING AND VIDEO ENTERTAINMENT DIRECTED TO CHILDREN; MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS, DEVICES FOR THE PRODUCTION AND REPRODUCTION OF VIDEO IMAGES, VOICE, MUSIC AND DATA TRANSMISSION, NAMELY, VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS, AUDIO CASSETTE RECORDERS, MIXING BOARDS, DIGITAL VIDEO EQUIPMENT, DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS, DIGITAL AUDIO RECORDERS, MICROPHONES, CAMERAS, EDITING BOARDS AND SPLICING EQUIPMENTACTIVE—
041MOTION PICTURE FILM PRODUCTION; TELEVISION PRODUCTION; AUDIO RECORDING AND PRODUCTION; VIDEOTAPE PRODUCTION; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF TELEVISION SERIES AND LIVE MUSICAL GROUPS; PUBLICATION OF BOOKS; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF LIVE THEATRICAL PERFORMANCES AND TELEVISION SERIES; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF CHILDREN'S ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 9, 200344EDSEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED—
May 9, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 4, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 9, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2002PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2001PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 26, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 10, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 10, 2000IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Oct 10, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 18, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 16, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 22, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance