USPTO serial 75701744
INTERCEPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERCEPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75008 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J. PATCH
Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed advertising matter, namely, periodicals, brochures and newsletters in the field of advertising | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | advertising agency services, namely, publication of advertising text, renting of advertising material, providing public relations services; commercial and business information services, namely, providing information on market studies, forecasting, sales, market research and consulting services in connection therewith; organizing trade-shows and exhibitions in the field of market studies and advertising services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |