Drawing for ROLLING STONES

USPTO serial 75702082

ROLLING STONES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROLLING STONES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miriam Claire Beezy

MIRIAM CLAIRE BEEZY MITCHELL, SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wine and spirits, namely, alcoholic beverage produced from a brewed malt base with natural flavors, prepared alcoholic cocktail, alcoholic coffee-based beverage, alcoholic malt coolers, alcoholic tea-based beverage, amontillado, anisette, alcoholic aperitif bitters, aperitif wines, aperitifs with a distilled alcoholic liquor base, aperitifs with a wine base, arrack, alcoholic aperitif bitters, alcoholic bitters, brandy, cherry brandy, French brandy, cooking brandy, brandy spirits, calvados, champagne, hard cider, prepared alcoholic cocktail, prepared wine cocktail, cognac, cooking wine, cordials, curacao, distilled spirits, distilled spirits of rice, distilled spirts made of corn, distilled spirts made of barley, extracts of spiritous liquors, gin, herb liqueurs, kirsch, liqueurs, distilled liquor, mead, ouzo, port wines, alcoholic punch, wine punch, rum, sake or saki, sangria, schnapps, sherry, potable spirits, spirits made from rice, spirits made from fruit, tequila, vermouth, vodka, whiskey, fruit wine, red wine, white wine, wine coolers, and pamphlets and booklets in the fields of music and wine and spirits sold together as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2001ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 4, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 4, 2001OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 31, 2001OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 22, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 28, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance