USPTO serial 75702467
CRAYONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRAYONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W Armstrong
JAMES W ARMSTRONG SACKS TIERNEY PA4250 N DRINKWATER BLVDSCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251-3647UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair conditioners, body lotions, baby oils, suntan lotions, sunscreen, sun block preparations, non-medicated lip balms and liquid soaps for the hands, face and body | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |