USPTO serial 75702751
DOT COM DROPS OF TRUE COMFORT RELIEF FROM EYESTRAIN AND DRY EYE DUE TO PROLONGED VIEWING OF VIDEO DISPLAY TERMINALS (COMPUTERS, TV, ECT.)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOT COM DROPS OF TRUE COMFORT RELIEF FROM EYESTRAIN AND DRY EYE DUE TO PROLONGED VIEWING OF VIDEO DISPLAY TERMINALS (COMPUTERS, TV, ECT.)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Eyedrops for providing relief from eyestrain and dry eye due to prolonged viewing of video display terminals, computers, television and other related equipment | ACTIVE | Nov 6, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KRAUSE, JOHN L.
- Other trademarks owned by KRAUSE, JOHN L.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named DOT COM DROPS OF TRUE COMFORT RELIEF FROM EYESTRAIN AND DRY EYE DUE TO PROLONGED VIEWING OF VIDEO DISPLAY TERMINALS (COMPUTERS, TV, ECT.)
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2003 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |