Drawing for IMPACT PHOTOGRAPHY

USPTO serial 75702771

IMPACT PHOTOGRAPHY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMPACT PHOTOGRAPHY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY H. GREGER

JEFFREY H GREGER MASON MASON & ALBRIGHT2306 S EADS STPO BOX 2246ARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Professional photography services, namely, customized individual photographic portrait and portfolio services exclusively for athletes, namely fitness and physique photography and athletic model photographyACTIVEDec 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 26, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 13, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 6, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 31, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance