USPTO serial 75702775
THE BEACON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 2004
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE BEACON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sioux Falls, SD
Sioux Falls, SD
Sioux Falls, SD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea M. Bond
Andrea M. Bond BRIGGS AND MORGAN, P.A.80 South Eighth Street2200 IDS CenterMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | RADIO COMMUNICATION SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 23, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 18, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 5, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 5, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |