USPTO serial 75702852
SHEEPWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHEEPWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tuscaloosa, AL
Tuscaloosa, AL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher A. Holland, Esq.
CHRISTOPHER A HOLLAND BURR & FORMAN420 20TH ST N STE 3100BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203-5206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical sheepskins, namely, pads made of medical sheepskin for the treatment of bed sores and pressure ulcers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |