Drawing for NANOSTRUCTURE

USPTO serial 75703372

NANOSTRUCTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOSTRUCTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stanley M. Schurgin

STANLEY M SCHURGIN WEINGARTEN, SCHURGIN, GAGNEBIN & HAYESLLPTEN POST OFFICE SQBOSTON, MA 02109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009non contact gauge and associated software for dimensionally characterizing a substrate, particularly a semiconductor waferACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 30, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 29, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 22, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 21, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 21, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 4, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance