Drawing for NANOTOPOLOGY

USPTO serial 75703513

NANOTOPOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOTOPOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles L. Gagnebin III

CHARLES L GAGNEBIN III WEINGARTEN, SCHURGIN, GAGNEBIN & HAYESTEN POST OFFICE SQBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009NON-CONTACT OPTICAL IMAGING HARDWARE AND ASSOCIATED SOFTWARE FOR CHARACTERIZING THE SURFACE OF A SUBSTRATE SUCH AS A SEMI-CONDUCTOR WAFERACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 4, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 14, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 2, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 28, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance