USPTO serial 75703771
TEAM BEANS AUTHENTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEAM BEANS AUTHENTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil A. Burstein
CHARLES F SCHILL ESQ FOLEY & LARDNERSTE 5003000 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5143Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MEN'S, WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, SPORTS APPAREL AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, JERSEYS, RUGBY SHIRTS, SWEATERS, WRISTBANDS, HEADBANDS, VESTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, SPORTS SHIRTS, TANKTOPS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS, WARM-UP SUITS, CAPS, HATS, BELTS, SHORTS, PANTS, PAJAMAS, UNDERWEAR, BOXERS, TIES, SOCKS AND FOOTWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |