Drawing for HOMESTEAD COLLECTION

USPTO serial 75703927

HOMESTEAD COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOMESTEAD COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Murray Schaffer

MURRAY SCHAFFER BAUER & SCHAFFER114 OLD COUNTRY RDMINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021CAST IRON POTS AND PANSACTIVEAug 11, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 14, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 14, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 25, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 19, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 29, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 10, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance