USPTO serial 75703997
RODIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAW, CHRISTOPHER M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RODIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George Gottlieb
GEORGE GOTTLIEB GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | VASES, DECORATIVE BOXES, PICTURE FRAMES, CANDLESTICK HOLDERS, PLATES, DISHES, CUPS, FIGURINES, BEVERAGE GLASSWARE, SAUCERS, PLATTERS, SERVING BOWLS, CREAMERS, DECORATIVE PLATES, FLOWER POTS, DECORATIVE BELLS, DECORATIVE BALLS, ALL OF THE FOREGOING MADE OF PORCELAIN OR CERAMIC | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | SERVING TRAYS, MEAL TRAYS, SERVING PLATTERS, DECORATIVE BOWLS AND CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE, NAMELY, DECORATIVE GLOBES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |