USPTO serial 75704057
SANPATH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 5, 2002
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SANPATH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SILICON ALLEY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
WILMINGTON, DE
Carlsbad, CA
SILICON ALLEY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
WILMINGTON, DE
CARLSBAD, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward M. Rosensteel
EDWARD M ROSENSTEEL90 PARK AVE 17TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT PROVIDES A REDUNDANT DATA PATH AND LOAD BALANCING TO PROTECT DATA IN THE EVENT OF COMPUTER HARDWARE COMPONENT FAILURES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 2, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SILICON ALLEY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Artecon, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SILICON ALLEY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DOT HILL SYSTEMS CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SANPATH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |