USPTO serial 75704783
WESTPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WESTPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mikolean M. Longacre
MIKOLEAN M LONGACRE LAW OFFICE OF 1061 BARNWELL ROADFERNADINA BEACH, FL 32034UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Engine parts, namely fuel injectors, pumps for liquid, gaseous and liquefied gas fuels; and hydraulic control systems, namely hydraulically driven pumps and compressors, hydraulically operated actuators, hydraulically operated valves, and hydraulic fluid control valves | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electrical control systems for controlling vehicle drives and engines, engine fuel delivery, gas compression equipment, fuel injectors, data acquisition, diagnostics, and interfacing with other electronic controls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |