USPTO serial 75704891
BIG MAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIG MAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chung-gu Seoul 100-070, KR
Chung-gu Seoul 100-070, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley P. Fisher
STANLEY P FISHER HAZEL & THOMASFAIRVIEW PARK PO BOX 12001FALLS CHURCH, VA 22042-0681UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Bicycles, saddles for bicycles, saddle covers for bicycles, frames for bicycles, tires for bicycles, electric locomotives, motorcycles, passenger cars, steering wheels for automobiles, and rubber belts for land vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 12, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |