USPTO serial 75706130
ACUPUNCTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACUPUNCTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London EC1M 4AN, GB
London EC1M 4AN, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY P. FRAELICH
TIMOTHY P FRAELICH JONES & DAYN POINT, 901 LAKESIDE AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS; JEWELRY, PENS, PICTURE FRAMES, PHOTOGRAPH FRAMES, JUGS, VASES, CIGARETTE CASES, CIGARETTE LIGHTERS, DECORATIVE BOXES, JEWELRY BOXES, AND JEWELRY CASES, ALL MADE FROM OR COATED WITH PRECIOUS METALS; PRECIOUS AND SEMI-PRECIOUS GEMSTONES; CLOCKS AND WATCHES | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | LUGGAGE; SPORTS BAGS, BEACH BAGS, CLUTCH BAGS, OVERNIGHT BAGS, SCHOOL BAGS, SATCHELS, TRAVEL BAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, COSMETIC BAGS SOLD EMPTY, GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL, TOTE BAGS; PURSES, WALLETS, KEY FOBS MADE OF LEATHER, BRIEFCASES, ATTACHE CASES, DOCUMENT CASES, VANITY CASES SOLD EMPTY | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, JACKETS, WAISTCOATS, SWEATERS, FLEECE TOPS AND FLEECE TROUSERS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SUITS, TROUSERS, SHORTS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, UNDERWEAR, LINGERIE, SWIMWEAR, PAJAMAS, NIGHTDRESSES, DRESSING GOWNS, HATS, SCARVES, GLOVES, MITTENS, SHAWLS, AND CLOTHING, NAMELY WRAPS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Triple Juicy Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Triple Juicy Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ACUPUNCTURE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |