USPTO serial 75706369
RACE-LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 2001
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RACE-LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D72574 Bad Urach, DE
D72574 Bad Urach, DE
D72574 Bad Urach, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce W. McKee
Bruce W. McKee McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC801 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309-2721UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Brakes for bicycles, hydraulic brakes for bicycles, hydraulic rim brakes for bicycles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GUSTAV MAGENWIRTH GMBH & CO.
- Other trademarks owned by GUSTAV MAGENWIRTH GMBH & CO.
- Other trademarks owned by GUSTAV MAGENWIRTH GMBH & CO.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named RACE-LINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 22, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 29, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 18, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 22, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |