USPTO serial 75707293
VERSITECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERSITECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rogue River, OR
Rogue River, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID T BRACKEN
DAVID T BRACKEN THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID T BRACKEN4839 BOND AVEORANGE, CA 92869UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HAND PUMPED TRIGGER SPRAYERS NOT USED WITH MECHANICALLY PRESSURIZED SPRAY CONTAINERS AND SOLD AS A COMPONENT PART TRIGGER SPRAYER WITH A CONTAINER OR BOTTLE THAT MAY EVENTUALLY BE COMBINED THEREWITH FOR HOUSEHOLD USE OR COMMERCIAL USE; DUAL LIQUID HAND OPERATED SPRAYER HEADS AND CONDUIT CONNECTIONS TO LIQUID RESERVOIR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of the TAKE 5 Trust, a Delaware trust, the trustee comprising Walter R. Foster, a U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of the TAKE 5 Trust, a Delaware trust, the trustee comprising Walter R. Foster, a U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named VERSITECH
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |