USPTO serial 75707344
L.E.I.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with L.E.I.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J MACDERMOTT
KATHERINE BLAUKOPF JONES APPAREL GROUP INC39TH FL LEGAL DEPT1411 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, FOUNDATIONS, EYE SHADOWS, EYELINERS, EYE PENCILS, MASCARA, CHEEK POWDERS AND BLUSH, LIPSTICKS, LIP GLOSS, LIP STICK SEALERS, LIP BALMS, MAKEUP REMOVER, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH BASE COAT, NAIL POLISH TOP COAT, NAIL HARDENER AND NAIL POLISH REMOVER; PERFUME AND TOILETRIES, NAMELY, PERFUMES, COLOGNES, EAU DE TOILETTE, TOILET MILKS, DUSTING BODY POWDERS, BATH POWDERS, TALCUM POWDERS, BODY DEODORANTS FOR PERSONAL USE; BATH AND BODY PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, TOILET AND BATH SOAPS, LOTIONS AND OILS, SUN TANNING CREAMS, SKIN TONERS, SKIN MOISTURIZERS, CLEANSING AND MOISTURIZING CREAMS, CLEANSING AND TONIC LOTIONS; FACIAL CREAMS, FACIAL LOTIONS, AND BEAUTY MASKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | RETAIL CLOTHING STORES, RETAIL APPAREL STORES, RETAIL SHOES STORES, RETAIL JEWELRY STORES, BOUTIQUES IN DEPARTMENT STORES; ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING CLOTHING, APPAREL, FOOTWEAR, COSMETICS, PERFUME, TOILETRIES, EYEWEAR, WATCHES, JEWELRY, LEATHER GOODS AND SPORTING GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |