USPTO serial 75708520
COUNTRY HOMECOMING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COUNTRY HOMECOMING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey J. Look
JEFFREY J LOOK JACK, LYON & JONES, PA3400 TCBY TWR425 W CAPITOL AVELITTLE ROCK, AR 72201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Live concerts and performances by musical groups, artists and entertainers, television programs featuring performances by musical groups, artists and entertainers radio programs featuring performances by musical groups, artists and entertainers, providing information about concerts, music, musical groups, artists entertainers and performers via a global computer information network | ACTIVE | Oct 9, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |