Drawing for SIGNATUREONE

USPTO serial 75708790

SIGNATUREONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOORE, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIGNATUREONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL J RITTER

MICHAEL J RITTER RITTER LANG & KAPLAN LLP12930 SARATOGA AVE STE D1SARATOGA, CA 95070UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for signing and authenticating documents for use in on-line electronic commerce; computer software for viewing, capturing and stamping hand written electronic signatures used in connection with electronic documents; computer software for cryptographically binding electronic signature data to documents; computer software for electronic commerce security, namely, software that verifies the authenticity of an e-mail document; computer software for identity authentication in a computer network; computer software for authentication using biometrics; computer software for computer security; and computer software for use in management, storage, and administration of databases that contain documents with secure electronic signaturesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 9, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 13, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 5, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 23, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 1, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance