USPTO serial 75708814
THOMSON FINANCIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THOMSON FINANCIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael S. Harris
DONNA M DIMITRI THE THOMSON CORPORATION1 STATION PLSTAMFORD, CT 06902-6800UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | house mark for providing a full range of financial services, namely, information, analyses and reports to banking and financial institutions and corporate executives including the purchase and sale of securities, trade information, new issues for corporate debt and equity securities, credit card marketing, investment research reports on municipal markets and treasury cash, mergers and acquisitions, ownership of corporations, information regarding corporate and financial executives, post trade operations in the global securities markets | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBAL INFORMATIONAL LICENSING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ME Licensing Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ME Licensing Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named THOMSON FINANCIAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2004 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |