USPTO serial 75709067
RANGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RANGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARLA B OAKLEY
CARLA B OAKLEY BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWRONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | SPRINKLERS, NOZZLES, COUPLINGS AND WATERING PRODUCT ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, HOSE CLAMPS AND FITTINGS, BRASS COUPLINGS, HOSE SPRAY NOZZLES, COMPRESSION HOSE FAUCETS, PLAIN BIBBS (FAUCETS WHICH ARE NOT THREADED AT THEIR OUTLET END), HOSE ADAPTER, NIPPLES, LAWN FAUCETS, COMPRESSION STOPS, GLOBE VALVES, WASH TRAY FAUCETS, GARDEN HOSE SIAMESE OR Y HOSE CONNECTORS, APPARATUS TO DISTRUBUTE WATER TO LAWNS, PLANTS, ETC, NAMELY, LAWN SPRINKLERS, IMPULSE LAWN SPRINKLER HEADS, AS WELL AS HEAD AND SUPPORTING BASE COMBINATIONS, AND PARTS THEROF | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |