USPTO serial 75709328
STINGRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STINGRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South Holland, IL
South Holland, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
BURTON S EHRLICH ARNSTEIN & LEHRSTE 1200120 S RIVERSIDE PLZCHICAGO, IL 60606-3910Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | remote control system for activating automobile, motor home, and boat security, safety, and convenience systems, including door and trunk openers, lighting, heaters, defrosters, air conditioners, and engine starters, comprised of control module, sensors, door and window triggers, remotely controlled starters for remotely starting the vehicle engines, units for remote tracking, remote transmitters, talking modules to warn theft, and engine starter cutoff, sold as a unit; remote control systems for opening garage door and activating interior garage lighting, comprised of the control modules and parts thereof, remote transmitters and parts thereof, sold as a unit; automotive police radar and police laser detectors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |